NC Ruling Just the First Step in Legal Battle to Protect Voters of Color - Advancement Project - Advancement Project

NC Ruling Just the First Step in Legal Battle to Protect Voters of Color

WASHINGTON – Voting rights advocates today announced plans to appeal an April 25, 2016 ruling from the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina which upheld H.B. 589, North Carolina’s monster voter suppression law. The court ruled the measure does not violate the Voting Rights Act or the Fourteenth, Fifteenth or Twenty-Sixth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The current injunction on the law’s proscriptions of same day registration and out of precinct voting – which has been in place since 2015 – will remain in effect until June. In August of 2013, Advancement Project, along with co-counsel from Kirkland & Ellis, LLP and attorneys Irving Joyner and Adam Stein, challenged H.B. 589 on behalf of the North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP.

“The continuation of H.B. 589’s restrictive provisions is an affront to democracy, and we are appealing the decision,” said the Rev. Dr. William J. Barber II, president of the North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP and architect of the Forward Together Moral Movement. “Passing H.B. 589 right after the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act in June of 2013, as the North Carolina General Assembly did back in August 2013, indicates this law was intentionally discriminatory. Prior to Shelby, North Carolina had to submit proposed voting legislation for preclearance. After Shelby, the legislature acted with warp-speed to pass the monster voter suppression law. Through widespread actions, rallies, marches and protests, we continue to assert that we will accept no less than unabridged access to the ballot for all eligible voters. We appealing this dangerous precedent on behalf of tens of thousands of NC NAACP members and plaintiffs.”

“In abridging voting rights for African Americans and Latinos, H.B. 589 turns back the clock to our nation’s terrible Jim Crow past,” said Advancement Project Co-Director Penda D. Hair. “In a democracy, voting should be free, fair and accessible for all eligible voters. H.B. 589 tactically targets the provisions that once made North Carolina among the states with the highest turnout in the nation. This progress was especially clear among African-American and Latino voters, who came to rely on measures like early voting, same-day registration and out of precinct provisional ballots to ensure their voices were heard. By specifically targeting the very measures that were most used by people of color – in addition to imposing a restrictive photo ID requirement – the legislature sought to disturb the levers of power in North Carolina.”

“The court’s decision admits historic discrimination, but ignores how that discrimination impacts voting rights today,” said Attorney Michael Glick of Kirkland & Ellis, LLP. “The court may be attempting to justify their decision upholding the voter suppression law by pointing to high turnout in 2014, when the voter ID provision of the law was not in effect. However, to uphold the voter suppression law based on turnout in 2014 is short-sighted and ignores the burdens already borne by African American and Latino voters. We intend to seek relief for the provisions of the law that we believe continue to disproportionately burden the rights of African Americans and Latinos to participate in the political process.”

“We cannot embrace a belief that if someone goes through herculean measures to miraculously overcome mammoth discrimination, then the discriminatory obstacles are okay. This is a faulty and dangerous rationalization,” said the Rev. Dr. William J. Barber, President of the North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP. “We were able to overcome discrimination during the period of segregated schools, but separate and unequal was never morally acceptable. Just because a political party cannot win if everyone votes doesn’t mean they should resort to trickery and engage in voter suppression.”

“By specifically eliminating the very measures responsible for opening access to voting for voters of color is the essence of retrogression,” Rev. Dr. Barber said. “If the protections of Section 5 were in place, this legislation would very likely have been found to be retrogressive. That speaks to why Congress must act to reinstate the protections of the Voting Rights Act and why North Carolina is at the epicenter of determining whether the U.S. is moving forward or backward.”

“For us this fight is not over,” said Attorney Irving Joyner. “This is the first step in a legal battle that will continue in the courts to ensure the Voting Rights Act continues to protect voters of color from discriminatory measures like H.B. 589.”

# # #

Advancement Project is a multi-racial civil rights organization. Founded by a team of veteran civil rights lawyers in 1999, Advancement Project was created to develop and inspire community-based solutions based on the same high quality legal analysis and public education campaigns that produced the landmark civil rights victories of earlier eras.


Trial Challenging Missouri’s Voter ID Law Set to Start Monday

CONTACT: Joshua Garner 240-326-3874 [email protected] JEFFERSON CITY, MO — In a case that could determine the fate of Missouri’s voter ID law, a coalition of local and national voter advocates kick off a trial Monday in a legal challenge to the implementation of that law. The trial will begin at 9 a.m. August 19 in Cole County Circuit Court before Judge Jon Beetem. At stake is Missourians’ fundamental right to vote. “States are not allowed to make an end-run around voting rights by imposing confusing and burdensome changes to the voting rules and then failing to ensure…

Read More
Advancement Project Turns 20

  Freedom Now! Freedom Forever! Attend our 20th anniversary celebration, Thursday, October 17. Buy Tickets Sponsor the Movement See sponsorship levels for our 20th anniversary celebration. Learn More Movement Lawyering Conference Join us on Wednesday, October 16, to learn about holistic strategies for racial justice movement lawyering. Learn More Looking into the Future In 2045, a majority of Americans will be people of color. The question is: are you ready to leverage your power?…

Read More
Enough is Enough

Chief Justice Roberts wrote in the majority opinion, "We conclude that partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts."

Read More
Civil Rights Organization Vows to Continue Fight to Ensure All Eligible Floridians Can Register and Vote, Despite Efforts to Undermine Amendment 4

“This legislation is about deterring Floridians who are less likely to vote for the current crop of legislators from casting a ballot – and that means Black & Brown people."

Read More
It’s Shelby Week! Congress Must Pass H.R. 4 to Strengthen the Voting Rights Act

On this National Day of Racial Healing, we must recognize that people of color are not given the chance to heal from their past.

Read More
The Voting Rights Saga in Florida Continues

Judith Browne Dianis testifies at Congressional Hearing on the State of Voting Rights in Florida “As we’ve learned in Florida, it’s too late after the vote is taken and counted to protect the civil rights of people of color.  And the problem is, the federal government is not watching.” On Monday, May 6, 2019, Advancement Project National Office testified before the U.S. House Committee on Administration in Miami during a hearing on the status of voting rights in Florida. As Judith Browne Dianis, our executive director, detailed in her testimony, Florida is a battleground in…

Read More
Advancement Project National Office: ‘We Must Shed Light on Discriminatory Voting Practices Now’

National Civil Rights Organizations Launch to Collect Stories of Voter Suppression, Drive Change Ahead of 2020 Presidential Election.

Read More
Because Justice Never Takes a Day Off

On April 28, 1999, Advancement Project National Office opened its doors. We were bright-eyed, yet already seasoned, ready to take on voting rights with a racial justice lens. We were winning cases and building a movement right out the door. Now that we have been addressing not only voting rights, but immigrant justice, criminal legal system issues and education justice for 20 years, some may ask what are we doing today to ensure the country’s next 20 years are freer for people of color? Glad you asked.

Read More
Amendment 4 Implementation Bills Are Yet Another Effort to Silence Voters

Florida lawmakers are intent on passing legislation that will undercut the passage of rights restoration for Floridians with prior felony convictions. Florida deserves better. Advancement Project National Office stands with the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition (FRRC) in opposing any Amendment 4 legislation that creates additional barriers to voting for Returning Citizens who would otherwise be eligible based on the passage of Amendment 4. Any legislation proposed should neither limit the rights created by Amendment 4 nor infringe upon the will of Florida voters. Florida’s current completion of sentence standard is built upon three basic components: A person has completed…

Read More
Voting Rights Restoration

The time is ripe to fundamentally reform our democracy.

Read More