Trial Challenging Missouri’s Voter ID Law Set to Start Monday - Advancement Project - Advancement Project

Trial Challenging Missouri’s Voter ID Law Set to Start Monday

CONTACT: Joshua Garner
240-326-3874
[email protected]

JEFFERSON CITY, MO — In a case that could determine the fate of Missouri’s voter ID law, a coalition of local and national voter advocates kick off a trial Monday in a legal challenge to the implementation of that law. The trial will begin at 9 a.m. August 19 in Cole County Circuit Court before Judge Jon Beetem.

At stake is Missourians’ fundamental right to vote.

“States are not allowed to make an end-run around voting rights by imposing confusing and burdensome changes to the voting rules and then failing to ensure sufficient funding to properly educate voters about those changes,” said Sophia Lakin, an attorney with the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project.

“Missouri’s law is confusing. At heart, voter ID requirements are designed to make it harder to vote – particularly for people of color, young voters, seniors, and voters with disabilities. The effect is magnified when the state fails to uphold its end of the bargain to ensure that voters are informed about the rules,” said Denise Lieberman, Senior Attorney and Director of Power & Democracy at Advancement Project National Office. “Invariably, the state’s failure to do so means the burden falls on the backs of voters.”

The case, Missouri State Conference of the NAACP et al. v. State of Missouri, brought by Advancement Project National Office, ACLU of Missouri, the ACLU National Voting Rights Project and Covington & Burling LLP more than two years ago on behalf of the Missouri State Conference of the NAACP, League of Women Voters of Missouri and Christine Dragonette, claims Missouri’s latest voter ID law was not sufficiently implemented, causing widespread confusion for voters and poll workers.

“The NAACP has long raised concerns about Missouri’s efforts to implement a voter ID law, and it is one of the reasons we have issued a travel advisory for the state,” said Nimrod Chapel, President of the Missouri State Conference of the NAACP, who will testify on Monday. “We look forward to having our day in court.”

“All eligible voters deserve the right to vote,” said Evelyn Maddox, President of the League of Women Voters of Missouri. “It is the state’s job to make sure that all eligible voters have access to the ballot. But instead voters have been left to fend for themselves, leading to confusion, especially after the law was changed just weeks before last year’s elections. Missouri should be more responsive to the needs of its voters.”

Missouri’s voter ID law went into effect in 2017, following passage of a voter referendum in 2016, and is the latest in a more than decade-long saga of voter ID in Missouri, following a national trend of states passing overly restrictive voting laws. Missouri’s law explicitly requires the state to notify voters and provides that the voter ID requirements cannot go into effect if the state has failed to fund these mandates.

“Voters were promised that Missouri’s voter ID law was not about disenfranchising the most vulnerable in our state,” said Tony Rothert, legal director of the ACLU of Missouri. “The state’s lack of funding and implementation of this law tells another story.”

“This law creates real consequences for voters,” said plaintiff Christine Dragonette, who oversees an ID acquisition program through St. Francis Xavier College Church in St. Louis. “Without adequate information and assistance, the people I work with face real obstacles navigating the process.”

The case was filed in June 2017 when the voter ID law went into effect, but was initially dismissed. A court of appeals ruling last year allowed the case to go forward. “More than two years after filing this lawsuit, we are pleased our clients will finally have their day in court,” said attorney Robert Fram from the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP.

Since 2010, at least 15 states have implemented stricter voter identification requirements, including six with strict photo ID requirements. These laws have been found to disproportionately impact voters of color, seniors, young voters and other marginalized communities. Missouri was one of the first states to pass a strict photo ID requirement in 2006, but that law was struck by the Missouri Supreme Court, which found it violated the right to vote. The 2016 constitutional amendment allowed the current law to be implemented. State records indicate that more than 220,000 registered voters in Missouri lack a current state-issued ID.

“The stakes are high,” Lieberman said. “Without a proactive robust outreach effort, we risk blocking thousands of valid voters from their rightful place in democracy.”

The case was filed on behalf of the Missouri State Conference of the NAACP, the League of Women Voters of Missouri and Christine Dragonette. Trial begins at 9 a.m. Monday, August 19 in Cole County Circuit Court.

###

Advancement Project is a multi-racial civil rights organization. Founded by a team of veteran civil rights lawyers in 1999, Advancement Project was created to develop and inspire community-based solutions based on the same high quality legal analysis and public education campaigns that produced the landmark civil rights victories of earlier eras.

The ACLU preserves and expands the constitutional rights and civil liberties of all Missourians as guaranteed in the Missouri and U.S. Constitutions, with a focus on the Bill of Rights, the first ten Amendments.

KEEP READING

Advancement Project Turns 20

  Freedom Now! Freedom Forever! Attend our 20th anniversary celebration, Thursday, October 17. Buy Tickets Sponsor the Movement See sponsorship levels for our 20th anniversary celebration. Learn More Movement Lawyering Conference Join us on Wednesday, October 16, to learn about holistic strategies for racial justice movement lawyering. Learn More Looking into the Future In 2045, a majority of Americans will be people of color. The question is: are you ready to leverage your power?…

Read More
Enough is Enough

Chief Justice Roberts wrote in the majority opinion, "We conclude that partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts."

Read More
Civil Rights Organization Vows to Continue Fight to Ensure All Eligible Floridians Can Register and Vote, Despite Efforts to Undermine Amendment 4

“This legislation is about deterring Floridians who are less likely to vote for the current crop of legislators from casting a ballot – and that means Black & Brown people."

Read More
It’s Shelby Week! Congress Must Pass H.R. 4 to Strengthen the Voting Rights Act

On this National Day of Racial Healing, we must recognize that people of color are not given the chance to heal from their past.

Read More
The Voting Rights Saga in Florida Continues

Judith Browne Dianis testifies at Congressional Hearing on the State of Voting Rights in Florida “As we’ve learned in Florida, it’s too late after the vote is taken and counted to protect the civil rights of people of color.  And the problem is, the federal government is not watching.” On Monday, May 6, 2019, Advancement Project National Office testified before the U.S. House Committee on Administration in Miami during a hearing on the status of voting rights in Florida. As Judith Browne Dianis, our executive director, detailed in her testimony, Florida is a battleground in…

Read More
Advancement Project National Office: ‘We Must Shed Light on Discriminatory Voting Practices Now’

National Civil Rights Organizations Launch WeVoteWeCount.org to Collect Stories of Voter Suppression, Drive Change Ahead of 2020 Presidential Election.

Read More
Because Justice Never Takes a Day Off

On April 28, 1999, Advancement Project National Office opened its doors. We were bright-eyed, yet already seasoned, ready to take on voting rights with a racial justice lens. We were winning cases and building a movement right out the door. Now that we have been addressing not only voting rights, but immigrant justice, criminal legal system issues and education justice for 20 years, some may ask what are we doing today to ensure the country’s next 20 years are freer for people of color? Glad you asked.

Read More
Amendment 4 Implementation Bills Are Yet Another Effort to Silence Voters

Florida lawmakers are intent on passing legislation that will undercut the passage of rights restoration for Floridians with prior felony convictions. Florida deserves better. Advancement Project National Office stands with the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition (FRRC) in opposing any Amendment 4 legislation that creates additional barriers to voting for Returning Citizens who would otherwise be eligible based on the passage of Amendment 4. Any legislation proposed should neither limit the rights created by Amendment 4 nor infringe upon the will of Florida voters. Florida’s current completion of sentence standard is built upon three basic components: A person has completed…

Read More
Voting Rights Restoration

The time is ripe to fundamentally reform our democracy.

Read More