Voting Rights Watchdogs Ask Court To Protect Missouri Voters Before Elections - Advancement Project - Advancement Project

Voting Rights Watchdogs Ask Court To Protect Missouri Voters Before Elections

Missouri Secretary of State, Department of Revenue in Knowing, Ongoing Violation of the National Voter Registration Act

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. – The League of Women Voters of Missouri and the St. Louis and Greater Kansas City Chapters of the A. Philip Randolph Institute (APRI) are seeking immediate relief to protect Missouri voters from being disenfranchised in the 2018 primary and general elections as a result of the state’s ongoing violation of federal voting rights law.

Today, Dēmos, Advancement Project’s national office, and the ACLU filed a motion for a preliminary injunction on behalf of the groups urging the Court take immediate measures to ensure all Missouri residents who update their address with the state’s motor vehicle agency, the Department of Revenue (DOR), are able to have their voter registration information updated at the same time. Failure to provide such services is a direct violation of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) and has serious consequences for the ability of Missouri voters to exercise their right to vote.

Under Missouri law, if a voter’s registration information does not reflect their current address they are denied a regular ballot. Instead, such voters must cast a provisional ballot and if they have moved from one election jurisdiction to another their ballot will not be counted. Because St. Louis County and Kansas City are their own election jurisdictions, the moment a voter moves outside the city limits they will be disenfranchised unless their registration address is updated. Under federal law, any time a voter reports a change of address with the state’s motor vehicle agency, the agency is supposed to automatically update the voter’s address with the relevant election officials unless the voter asks that the update not occur. The Missouri Secretary of State and Director of DOR are failing to meet this obligation when changes of address are reported online or by mail.

To remedy these violations of the law, relief is requested that would ensure that anyone who submitted a change of address using DOR’s online or mail systems since November 2016 will:

  • Have their provisional ballots counted; and
  • Receive a voter registration form at the address on file with DOR, as well as information on the polling location for that address.

In addition, the preliminary injunction motion requests that the Court order that DOR’s online and mail change-of-address systems be amended to offer the voter registration services required under federal law.

Read the preliminary injunction.

In response, the following statements were released:

Kathleen Boswell, President of the League of Women Voters of Missouri, said: “Each year, one of the major causes of disenfranchisement in the State results from when Missouri voters appear at the polls and find out that they are not registered at their current address. Bringing DOR’s voter registration practices into compliance with the NVRA would help reduce the number of qualified voters being shut out of the political process.”

Keith Robinson, President of the A. Philip Randolph Institute’s St. Louis Chapter, said: “People of color and low-income individuals are less likely to own homes or have dependable transportation, which results in more interaction with DOR. By failing to provide Missouri voters with the address update services required under federal law, the Secretary and the Director of DOR are effectively shutting the doors to our democracy on individuals whose voices are already underrepresented and too often ignored.”

Patricia A. Jones, President of the A. Philip Randolph Institute’s Greater Kansas City Chapter, said: “Problems with voter registration are one of the leading causes of disenfranchisement in the nationally. Missouri is no different. By failing to provide federally-mandated voter registration services, Missouri is contributing to these problems. The only counter our organization has is to expend scarce and limited resources trying to make sure that people are properly registered.”

Naila Awan, Counsel at Dēmos, said: “The right to vote is the core of our nation’s democracy. Missouri’s disregard of the NVRA is limiting access to the ballot and drowning out the voices of voters who deserve to be heard.”

Denise Lieberman, Co-Director of the Power and Democracy Program at Advancement Project’s national office and Coordinator of the Missouri Voter Protection Coalition, said: “Missouri’s ongoing failure to provide voter registration services required by federal law and update voters’ information when they move makes it more difficult for election officials to maintain accurate voter rolls, creates confusion at the polls, and strips Missourians of their right to vote. Communities of color, young voters and low income voters are hardest hit by these failures. These violations need to be remedied now to ensure that all eligible voters are able to cast a ballot in this year’s elections.”

Tony Rothert, Legal Director, ACLU of Missouri, said: “The court must intervene to stop Missouri from ignoring its obligations under federal law to make it easier for Missourians to vote. Our democracy works best when people are not hindered from participating because of the arbitrary choice of government officials to comply with the law.”

Davin Rosborough, Staff Attorney with the ACLU Voting Rights Project, said: “Missouri has had months of notice that they are violating federal voting rights law but have done nothing to fix their noncompliance. These remedies are necessary to ensure that more qualified Missourians have their votes counted in August and November and are not denied the franchise merely because DOR failed to update their voter registration.”

KEEP READING

BREAKING: Court Denies Motion from Civil Rights Groups Challenging Georgia’s Voting Line Relief Ban

GEORGIA – The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia denied a motion for a preliminary injunction to suspend the line relief ban in Senate Bill 202. Line relief is the practice of distributing food, water and other support to voters stuck waiting in line at a polling place. The plaintiffs include local Black faith leaders and Georgia civil rights groups. In response, Jess Unger, Staff Attorney for the Power and Democracy program at Advancement Project National Office, released this statement: “The criminalization of people providing food and water to voters who are waiting to cast their…

Read More
Hearing in Lawsuit Challenging Georgia Anti-Voting Rights Law Weighs Impact of Line Relief Restrictions

GEORGIA —  The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia will be hearing motions for a preliminary injunction in the consolidated litigation challenging SB 202 (In Re Georgia Senate Bill 202). This hearing will consider the “line relief” provision that criminalizes those who provide voters waiting in line with food and water, which disproportionately impacts communities of color in Georgia who face some of the longest waiting times at the ballot box in the country.  SB 202 creates significant barriers for Black, Latinx and other voters of color…

Read More
Advancement Project National Office Condemns New Anti-Voting Rights Law in Florida that Creates Office of Election Crimes, Mandates Special Voter-Fraud Police Officers

FLORIDA – Moments ago, Governor DeSantis signed into law a bill passed by the Republican Florida legislature that claims to fight “voter fraud” by creating an Office of Election Crimes and mandating the appointment of “special” members of law enforcement.  This comes on the heels of the conclusion of a trial challenging SB 90, another anti-voting rights measure in Florida. This law was successfully challenged in court by several national and Florida civil rights and voting rights groups, including Advancement Project. Similar anti-voting rights bills…

Read More
Civil Rights Organizations Celebrate Decision in Florida Voting Rights Trial

Chief U.S. District Judge Mark Walker released a landmark decision today in the nationally-watched voting rights trial on Florida’s SB 90 bill to strike down key provisions of the law. This restrictive voting law passed by the Republican-majority legislature and Gov. DeSantis  would have put in place new constraints on the use of drop boxes and organizations conducting voter registration drives, among other measures that would significantly hinder access to the vote for millions of state residents.

Read More
Trial Challenging Florida’s SB 90 Voter Suppression Law Begins Today

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. —  A trial challenging SB 90 (League of Women Voters v Lee), a Florida measure to make it harder and in many ways impossible for Black and Brown people to vote, kicked off on Monday, Jan. 31. This is one of the first trials of the year challenging anti-voting laws at the state level. It comes just as national voting rights efforts have stalled, with the Senate recently failing to change rules on the filibuster to pass voting rights.  SB 90 was passed by the Republican-controlled Florida Legislature and Gov. Ron DeSantis in spring…

Read More
Advancement Project National Office Statement on the Senate’s Failure to Pass Voting Rights Legislation

WASHINGTON — Last night, the Senate blocked the Freedom to Vote John R. Lewis Act from advancing to a final passage vote. In response to this, Judith Browne Dianis, Executive Director of the Advancement Project National Office released this statement: “Last night, all 50 Senate Republicans and two Senate Democrats voted to maintain the filibuster and block the Freedom to Vote Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act from advancing to a final vote. These bills would protect voters and undo many of the barriers and restrictions that bar thousands of Black, Latinx, Asian, and…

Read More
Advancement Project National Office: “Passing voting rights legislation will protect right to free, fair, and accessible elections”

Washington, DC — In response to President Biden’s speech in Georgia today on voting rights legislation and the filibuster, Judith Browne Dianis, Executive Director of Advancement Project National Office, issued this statement: “While President Biden’s speech in Georgia today rings the alarm on voting rights, we need to put out the fire by immediately changing Senate rules on the filibuster to pass voting rights legislation.  “The urgency of this moment cannot be understated. Black voters and other voters of color need concrete action on voting rights immediately. Over 400 state-level bills undermining the right to vote were introduced last…

Read More
Advancement Project National Office Applauds the Passage of the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act

CONTACT Jeralyn Cave [email protected] 202-921-7321 WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 4, the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. The legislation restores key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and helps prevent racial discrimination in voting by requiring states to obtain federal approval before enacting specific types of voting changes known to be racially discriminatory. The legislation also restores voters’ ability to challenge racial discrimination in court. Advancement Project National Office, a national racial justice and civil rights organization, released the following statement: “We applaud the efforts of the U.S.

Read More
Congress Must Combat New Wave of Voter Suppression, Pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act

On Monday, the U.S. House Judiciary hosted a hearing on H.R. 4, the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act (VRAA), discussing the need to restore federal oversight of elections in the wake of a new wave of voter suppression sweeping the nation.

Read More
Advancement Project National Office Statement on Brnovich v. DNC Supreme Court Case

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court further weakened the Voting Rights Act in its ruling in Brnovich v. DNC, a case challenging voting laws in Arizona that discard provisional ballots cast in the wrong precinct and limit who can return absentee ballots. In a 6-3 decision, the Court ruled that Arizona's voting laws do not violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, and its ban on ballot harvesting was not enacted with a racially discriminatory purpose. Advancement Project National Office, a 21st century racial justice organization release the following statement.

Read More