A World Free of Voter Suppression - Advancement Project - Advancement Project

A World Free of Voter Suppression

On Monday, Advancement Project National Office, in partnership with the W.K. Kellogg Racial Equity Anchor Collaborative, released a new report, We Vote We Count: The Need for Congressional Action to Secure the Right to Vote for All Citizens. The report details accounts of voter suppression and makes recommendations of how communities of color combat these measures.

This fall, Chioma Onwumelu, Georgetown University student and Advancement Project’s Communications Intern, had the chance to sit down with Gilda Daniels, Advancement Project’s Litigation Director. Listen as Daniels, the report’s primary author, discusses what a world free from voter suppression could look like. Hear the full 15-minute interview and read the transcript excerpt below.

Chioma Onwumelu: Imagine a world free from voter suppression and restrictive voting practices. What does that vision of free and safe look like to you?

Gilda Daniels: Free and safe looks to me like a place [where] there are very few restrictions on the right to vote. Certainly, there is interest in elections other than the presidential election. There is interest at the local level for school boards, county councilmen [elections]. Those are the people that you’re interacting and interfacing with on a more regular basis, than the President of the United States. I think it’s very important to have people involved in that area. And that people actually run for office. That we get involved in our representation in our own communities.

CO: Do you think there is enough political education surrounding voter suppression and voting rights in general?

GD: I don’t think so, I think voter suppression has essentially become one of those words that we hear but we don’t dissect to really understand what it means. When we say voter suppression, we’re essentially looking at devices and mechanisms that prohibit or diminish the opportunity to access the ballot; those come in many forms. So the education comes in understanding what forms voter suppression can take. Probably more importantly, people understanding how they can access their right to vote. Understanding where they can register and making sure that once they register that they get a confirmation from the registrar saying, “this is your polling place, these are your election districts” etc. Knowing what you need to take to the voting booth; do you need an ID in your state? So I don’t think we’ve talked enough about what the process is. We’ve seen that there are barriers to access but I think we could do a much better job of educating people on how to overcome those barriers.

CO: What can people be doing in terms of advocacy for people who are affected by voter suppression?

GD: We have a three-pronged approach: Educate. Legislate. Litigate. When I’m out speaking to organizations and groups, I try to leave them with those three things. Educate yourself about your voting and registration process in your locality. When’s the last day to register? How do you register? Where can you register? When is Election Day? What office is up for election? Who are these candidates and how can they represent you? Attend meetings and educate yourself not only about the process but about the candidates as well. And once you actually cast a ballot the process doesn’t end; it’s essentially just beginning. Because then you have people in place and you can petition to get them to legislate in a way that is meaningful to your community. Something that we do here at Advancement Project is work with groups on the ground, not only in the litigation process but also in the legislative and policy process. Find out what kinds of laws you would like to see in your community. Let’s draft policy reports and draft legislation that we can present to legislators for their consideration. Really educating ourselves about the process, then legislating. And if legislation doesn’t work, using litigation as a tool to try to create this environment where all people have access to the right to vote.

CO: Awesome, well this was a wealth of information and I thank you so much Gilda for talking to me today.

GD: Thank you Chioma.

Chioma Onwumelu is a Communications Intern at Advancement Project National Office.

 

KEEP READING

Advancement Project Releases Poll and Focus Group Data on Gen Z Voters of Color Spanning Four States

Advancement Project Releases Poll and Focus Group Data on Gen Z Voters of Color in Michigan, Florida, Georgia, and Virginia Issues that rose to the top include abortion access, the economy, and systemic racism and discrimination WASHINGTON D.C. – Today, Advancement Project released findings from a poll and focus groups of Gen Z voters of color (Black, Latinx, Indigenous, and Asian American and Pacific Islander) in Michigan, Florida, Georgia, and Virginia ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. This survey was conducted by HIT Strategies in September 2022.  “We know that when our…

Read More
BREAKING: Court Denies Motion from Civil Rights Groups Challenging Georgia’s Voting Line Relief Ban

GEORGIA – The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia denied a motion for a preliminary injunction to suspend the line relief ban in Senate Bill 202. Line relief is the practice of distributing food, water and other support to voters stuck waiting in line at a polling place. The plaintiffs include local Black faith leaders and Georgia civil rights groups. In response, Jess Unger, Staff Attorney for the Power and Democracy program at Advancement Project National Office, released this statement: “The criminalization of people providing food and water to voters who are waiting to cast their…

Read More
Hearing in Lawsuit Challenging Georgia Anti-Voting Rights Law Weighs Impact of Line Relief Restrictions

GEORGIA —  The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia will be hearing motions for a preliminary injunction in the consolidated litigation challenging SB 202 (In Re Georgia Senate Bill 202). This hearing will consider the “line relief” provision that criminalizes those who provide voters waiting in line with food and water, which disproportionately impacts communities of color in Georgia who face some of the longest waiting times at the ballot box in the country.  SB 202 creates significant barriers for Black, Latinx and other voters of color…

Read More
Advancement Project National Office Condemns New Anti-Voting Rights Law in Florida that Creates Office of Election Crimes, Mandates Special Voter-Fraud Police Officers

FLORIDA – Moments ago, Governor DeSantis signed into law a bill passed by the Republican Florida legislature that claims to fight “voter fraud” by creating an Office of Election Crimes and mandating the appointment of “special” members of law enforcement.  This comes on the heels of the conclusion of a trial challenging SB 90, another anti-voting rights measure in Florida. This law was successfully challenged in court by several national and Florida civil rights and voting rights groups, including Advancement Project. Similar anti-voting rights bills…

Read More
Civil Rights Organizations Celebrate Decision in Florida Voting Rights Trial

Chief U.S. District Judge Mark Walker released a landmark decision today in the nationally-watched voting rights trial on Florida’s SB 90 bill to strike down key provisions of the law. This restrictive voting law passed by the Republican-majority legislature and Gov. DeSantis  would have put in place new constraints on the use of drop boxes and organizations conducting voter registration drives, among other measures that would significantly hinder access to the vote for millions of state residents.

Read More
Trial Challenging Florida’s SB 90 Voter Suppression Law Begins Today

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. —  A trial challenging SB 90 (League of Women Voters v Lee), a Florida measure to make it harder and in many ways impossible for Black and Brown people to vote, kicked off on Monday, Jan. 31. This is one of the first trials of the year challenging anti-voting laws at the state level. It comes just as national voting rights efforts have stalled, with the Senate recently failing to change rules on the filibuster to pass voting rights.  SB 90 was passed by the Republican-controlled Florida Legislature and Gov. Ron DeSantis in spring…

Read More
Advancement Project National Office Statement on the Senate’s Failure to Pass Voting Rights Legislation

WASHINGTON — Last night, the Senate blocked the Freedom to Vote John R. Lewis Act from advancing to a final passage vote. In response to this, Judith Browne Dianis, Executive Director of the Advancement Project National Office released this statement: “Last night, all 50 Senate Republicans and two Senate Democrats voted to maintain the filibuster and block the Freedom to Vote Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act from advancing to a final vote. These bills would protect voters and undo many of the barriers and restrictions that bar thousands of Black, Latinx, Asian, and…

Read More
Advancement Project National Office: “Passing voting rights legislation will protect right to free, fair, and accessible elections”

Washington, DC — In response to President Biden’s speech in Georgia today on voting rights legislation and the filibuster, Judith Browne Dianis, Executive Director of Advancement Project National Office, issued this statement: “While President Biden’s speech in Georgia today rings the alarm on voting rights, we need to put out the fire by immediately changing Senate rules on the filibuster to pass voting rights legislation.  “The urgency of this moment cannot be understated. Black voters and other voters of color need concrete action on voting rights immediately. Over 400 state-level bills undermining the right to vote were introduced last…

Read More
Advancement Project National Office Applauds the Passage of the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act

CONTACT Jeralyn Cave [email protected] 202-921-7321 WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 4, the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. The legislation restores key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and helps prevent racial discrimination in voting by requiring states to obtain federal approval before enacting specific types of voting changes known to be racially discriminatory. The legislation also restores voters’ ability to challenge racial discrimination in court. Advancement Project National Office, a national racial justice and civil rights organization, released the following statement: “We applaud the efforts of the U.S.

Read More
Congress Must Combat New Wave of Voter Suppression, Pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act

On Monday, the U.S. House Judiciary hosted a hearing on H.R. 4, the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act (VRAA), discussing the need to restore federal oversight of elections in the wake of a new wave of voter suppression sweeping the nation.

Read More