The Supreme Court Sees through the Trump Administration’s Racist Census Question - Advancement Project - Advancement Project

The Supreme Court Sees through the Trump Administration’s Racist Census Question

In a victory for immigrants and communities of color, a citizenship question will not be added to the 2020 Census.

In a victory for immigrants and communities of color, a citizenship question will not be added to the 2020 Census. The Supreme Court decided yesterday that the Trump administration’s reason for adding a citizenship question to the Census was “contrived” – and that the administration must provide a better explanation before any such question can be added.

The U.S. Constitution mandates a national Census every 10 years; the count is meant to provide a variety of information about the state of the population. Data from the census provides information for critically important decisions – everything from the number of representatives each state gets in Congress to where to build new roads and schools.

But given the aggressive actions of the Trump administration against noncitizens and immigrants, the addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 Census would likely result in a dramatic undercount of the overall population – as many as 9 million people might not be counted. Put another way, more people than live in the state of New Jersey might be missed by the Census. Those going uncounted would be noncitizens, immigrants, and people with noncitizens in their families. The towns, cities, and states where these communities live would be underfunded and underrepresented. Their voices would be diminished not just in 2020, but for the next 10 years.

Despite these predicted effects, the Trump administration maintained that the reason it wanted to add a citizenship question was to enforce protections for communities of color under the Voting Rights Act (VRA) – a laughable proposition, given that the Trump Administration has brought zero cases under the VRA since inauguration. But Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross wrote in a March 2018 memo that enforcing the VRA was the reason for adding the question to the Census. He also said that the Department of Justice (DOJ) had asked Commerce to do so.

During litigation, however, it became clear that the Secretary had lied. It was his own staff who reached out to DOJ originally, asking DOJ to request Commerce to add a question on citizenship so that Commerce would have a reason to do so. In fact, it emerged that Secretary Ross looked into adding a citizenship question barely a week after being confirmed. And in a dramatic, movie-worthy twist, files were discovered on a deceased Republican strategist’s computer that showed that adding a citizenship question was promoted explicitly because it would dilute the political power of the Latinx community.

Clearly, the Trump Administration was not trying to enforce the VRA. And that’s basically what the Supreme Court’s opinion said – and why the case was sent back to the agency in order to better describe their reasoning.

Unfortunately, this means that the Supreme Court’s decision is only temporary. If the agency is somehow able to return with a different, non-VRA explanation for why they want to add the question (and the explanation is backed up by past emails, files, and documents), then Chief Justice Roberts will likely approve the question.

It’s worth pausing on this: the five conservative members of the Court see nothing wrong with adding the citizenship question, despite its predicted impact on communities of color. That is why, this decision aside, the Court will not be a partner in protecting the rights of immigrants and noncitizens. We cannot rely on the courts – we must continue to organize and build power.

Happily, this decision was still a win. It is unlikely that the 2020 Census will contain the citizenship question, as the Trump Administration repeatedly emphasized the need for the Census Bureau to start printing forms by the end of June. It will be very challenging for Commerce to come up with a new rationale in time to meet that deadline.

The Supreme Court’s decision is great news for immigrant families and communities of color. But the decision was a complicated one – and again, only temporary. That means your advocacy and amplification of this issue is still needed.

Anna Applebaum is a legal intern with Advancement Project National. She is a J.D. candidate at NYU Law.


Trump Administration’s Regulation Punishes Immigrant Families for Using Life-Saving Services

Contact: Elana Needle [email protected] 201-248-9724  WASHINGTON – On August 12th, the Trump Administration’s Department of Homeland Security announced it will be publishing its finalized public charge rule, continuing its history of actions and policies harmful to immigrant communities. The finalized rule change, which is expected to be published on August 14, 2019, will go into effect on October 15, 2019. These changes will likely have a chilling effect – not only increasing the number of immigrants denied lawful permanent residence based on their use of certain government services, household income, and…

Read More
‘Public Charge’ Rule Punishes Immigrant Families Color

'Public charge' changes will keep immigrants of color from citizenship, voting

Read More
STATEMENT: Mississippi raid is state-sanctioned violence, attack on communities of color

Advancement Project National Office is on the ground in Mississippi organizing against this attack WASHINGTON, DC – On Wednesday, August 7, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents conducted the largest raid in U.S. history in Morton, MS.Advancement Project National Office, a multi-racial civil rights organization, released the following statement: “As our nation is reeling from the shootings in El Paso, Texas, and in Dayton, Ohio, more than 600 ICE agents descended on a poultry processing plant in Morton, Mississippi conducting the largest ever workplace ICE raid in U.S. history, arresting 680 immigrants, leaving hundreds of children without parents and stranded after the…

Read More
Advancement Project National Office Statement on El Paso Tragedy

On August 3, Patrick Crusius, a white supremacist, open fired at an El Paso shopping center, murdering 22 people and injuring at least 26 others. The violent attack targeting the region’s Latinx community occurred 20 minutes after the killer posted an anti-immigrant manifesto on the hate-filled social media platform 8chan. Advancement Project National Office, a multi-racial civil rights organization, released the following statement:

Read More
Civil Rights Coalition Condemns Deplorable Conditions at Pennsylvania Immigrant Detention Center

WASHINGTON – Citing inhumane conditions and constitutional violations, Advancement Project National Office, Juntos, and Casa San Jose today filed a letter of findings with the Philadelphia U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Field Office, the York County Prison, and the ICE Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties in Washington, DC. The letter details the organizations’ eyewitness accounts of deplorable conditions during their April 2, 2019, stakeholder visit to York County Prison. “Our visit to York County Prison was heart wrenching and depressing. Witnessing how the current immigration detention system criminalizes and punishes…

Read More
Advancement Project Turns 20

  Freedom Now! Freedom Forever! Attend our 20th anniversary celebration, Thursday, October 17. Buy Tickets Sponsor the Movement See sponsorship levels for our 20th anniversary celebration. Learn More Movement Lawyering Conference Join us on Wednesday, October 16, to learn about holistic strategies for racial justice movement lawyering. Learn More Looking into the Future In 2045, a majority of Americans will be people of color. The question is: are you ready to leverage your power?…

Read More
Advancement Project Denounces Trump Administration Plan to Place Migrant Youth in Former WWII Internment Camp

Federal government is bypassing legal agreement protecting treatment of migrant children by opening up prisons in military bases including Fort Sill, Oklahoma

Read More
National Civil Rights Organization supports American Dream and Promise Act of 2019, Opposes Migrant Criminalizing 

Statement in Support of H.R. 6, the American Dream and Promise Act of 2019, Opposition on Motion to Recommit 

Read More
Because Justice Never Takes a Day Off

On April 28, 1999, Advancement Project National Office opened its doors. We were bright-eyed, yet already seasoned, ready to take on voting rights with a racial justice lens. We were winning cases and building a movement right out the door. Now that we have been addressing not only voting rights, but immigrant justice, criminal legal system issues and education justice for 20 years, some may ask what are we doing today to ensure the country’s next 20 years are freer for people of color? Glad you asked.

Read More