Supreme Court Ruling on Texas Redistricting Case Affirms Value of One Person, One Vote - Advancement Project - Advancement Project

Supreme Court Ruling on Texas Redistricting Case Affirms Value of One Person, One Vote

WASHINGTON – In a unanimous 8-0 ruling, the Supreme Court today ruled that states may use total population to calculate and distribute voting districts. Plaintiffs in the case contended that instead, voting population should be used to create districts. This alternative scheme would have meant districts would grossly undercount younger populations and communities facing the highest barriers to registration and voting – factors that would undercut representation of communities of color. The national racial justice organization, Advancement Project, co-counsel on an amicus brief in this case, released the following statement in response to today’s ruling:

“Today’s ruling in Evenwel v. Abbott marks a critical turning point in the fight for equal representation in our democracy,” said Advancement Project Co-Director Penda D. Hair. “The Supreme Court has affirmed the value of one person, one vote to apply to all persons by rejecting a chaotic and discriminatory redistricting scheme that would count only a select few. Due to age distributions, immigration trends and our nation’s unfortunate legacy of voter suppression, basing our electoral mapping on voting population would have systematically pushed people of color out of the realm of equal representation. We are glad the Supreme Court rejected this scheme and maintained that our elected officials should represent all those who live in their district.”

“The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was enacted so that people of color would no longer be considered only three-fifths of a person. In rejecting the case made by plaintiffs in Evenwel, the court declined a scheme that would count some people as zero-fifths of a person,” said Advancement Project Director of Voter Protection Katherine Culliton-González. “This simply cannot be rationalized in a democracy, and we are pleased that the Supreme Court agreed. Excluding young Americans under the eligible voting age from redistricting maps is simply a proxy to undercount communities of color, which are on average younger than the White population. Only counting voting population when redistricting further discounts the 8.8 million lawful permanent residents in the United States who are eligible and waiting for naturalization. And even among naturalized and U.S.-born citizens who are above the age of 18, people of color still disproportionately face voter suppression tactics like voting list purges, disenfranchisement of formerly incarcerated people, and voter ID laws. Everyone deserves to be counted in a democracy – that is the crux of equal representation. Today’s ruling is one step, of many, needed to protect the core values of representative and constitutional democracy.”

# # #

www.fsaproject.wpengine.com

Advancement Project is a multi-racial civil rights organization. Founded by a team of veteran civil rights lawyers in 1999, Advancement Project was created to develop and inspire community-based solutions based on the same high quality legal analysis and public education campaigns that produced the landmark civil rights victories of earlier eras.

KEEP READING

Advancement Project National Office Applauds the Passage of the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act

CONTACT Jeralyn Cave [email protected] 202-921-7321 WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 4, the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. The legislation restores key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and helps prevent racial discrimination in voting by requiring states to obtain federal approval before enacting specific types of voting changes known to be racially discriminatory. The legislation also restores voters’ ability to challenge racial discrimination in court. Advancement Project National Office, a national racial justice and civil rights organization, released the following statement: “We applaud the efforts of the U.S.

Read More
Congress Must Combat New Wave of Voter Suppression, Pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act

On Monday, the U.S. House Judiciary hosted a hearing on H.R. 4, the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act (VRAA), discussing the need to restore federal oversight of elections in the wake of a new wave of voter suppression sweeping the nation.

Read More
Advancement Project National Office Statement on Brnovich v. DNC Supreme Court Case

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court further weakened the Voting Rights Act in its ruling in Brnovich v. DNC, a case challenging voting laws in Arizona that discard provisional ballots cast in the wrong precinct and limit who can return absentee ballots. In a 6-3 decision, the Court ruled that Arizona's voting laws do not violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, and its ban on ballot harvesting was not enacted with a racially discriminatory purpose. Advancement Project National Office, a 21st century racial justice organization release the following statement.

Read More
Our Democracy is in Danger, But You Can Help Save It

By Jenna Israel, Communications Intern As a young person, it often feels like there’s not a lot you can do to change a world that seems like it’s not listening to you. But for me, helping other people vote, engage their government, and make their voices heard is my activity of choice during my free time. It is empowering. One of the most heartbreaking things to hear when speaking to people in my community is that someone won’t vote. Sometimes it’s because they can’t. Maybe they’ve lost their right to vote as the result of incarceration. Or maybe they can’t…

Read More
With Democracy at a Crossroads, Senate Must End Jim Crow Filibuster

For Immediate Release: June 22, 2021 Contact: Jeralyn Cave, [email protected] WASHINGTON — In light of the Senate blocking S. 1, the For the People Act, Advancement Project’s national office, a multiracial civil rights organization, released the following statement:  “It is indisputable that Republican leaders would rather fuel their rhetoric of white grievance and villainize people of color than protect our democracy,” said Jorge Vasquez, Power and Democracy Director of Advancement Project National Office. “They have long attempted to distract from their failures and pass anti-voter bills at the state…

Read More
New PSA Unveil: Why Georgia Ministers are Mobilizing their Communities for Voting Rights

We are excited to unveil a new PSA around SB 202, Georgia egregious voter suppression law

Read More
National Civil Rights Org: Florida’s New Jim Crow Law Will Not Stand

Senate Bill 90 is a full-frontal assault on the political power of Black and Brown Floridians. Florida politicians are advancing baseless claims of fraud and abuse as an excuse to eliminate voting tools and procedures that enabled Floridians to vote safety and securely during a public health crisis.

Read More
Advancement Project National Office Condemns Passage of Florida Voter Suppression Bill

Yesterday, Florida’s state legislature passed Senate Bill 90, a monster voter suppression bill aimed at reducing access to the ballot box for Black and Brown voters.

Read More
Democracy on the Ropes

On April 7, 2021, Advancement Project National Office hosted Democracy on the Ropes, a special conversation with voting rights and racial justice leaders, on the intersections of voter suppression and the criminalization of protest. Held during the National #ForThePeople Week of Action, panelists explored how states have attempted to silence communities of color at the ballot box and in the streets. At least 43 states have advanced legislation making it harder to vote. In the last six months, states have also introduced 85 bills criminalizing freedom of assembly and restricting First Amendment. Speakers highlighted the organizing strategies, litigation and tools…

Read More